I know there’s a regulation for dietary fiber, but it’s so complicated I don’t know how to apply it.
To stay updated with our blog, subscribe below!
Key elements of the definition
The newest regulatory definition of dietary fiber was published by the FDA in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) on May 27, 2016 (Fed. Reg. 81(103:33852). This document is not light reading!
The first 225 pages contain the FDA’s answers to 543 comments that were received for the proposed changes to the food label. The actual amendments begin on page 33978 and continue for 21 pages. The definition of fiber is given on page 33979 (see inset).
The definition is consistent with those developed over several decades by other jurisdictions, as well as the CODEX Alimentarius Commission, an international body of scientists and delegates from many nations, including the United States. The FDA regulation defines the procedures for quantifying the fiber content of a food on the nutrition facts panel.
It is important to note that this process is separate from GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) requirements. That is, all ingredients used in food must comply with the FDA’s safety standards. But, to be claimed as fiber, foods must also comply with the new dietary fiber regulation.
The key feature of the regulation is the distinction between naturally-occurring and manufactured dietary fibers. Non-digestible carbohydrate that is naturally present in food (i.e. intrinsic fiber) can be counted as dietary fiber.
There is no requirement to demonstrate the health benefits of intrinsic fiber as the existing literature firmly demonstrates its beneficial effects on health.
Non-digestible carbohydrate that is synthetically-produced or is extracted from its natural source and added to food must demonstrate a health benefit (see box) or it cannot be counted towards the total amount of dietary fiber claimed on the nutrition facts panel. The health benefits cited by the FDA are listed as examples, with the recognition that other benefits of fiber might arise in the future. For synthetic or extracted non-digestible carbohydrates to qualify as dietary fiber, at least one benefit must be demonstrated.
What fibers have been approved?
Isolated/synthetic non-digestible carbohydrates
- Beta-glucan soluble fiber
- Psyllium husk
- Guar gum
- Locust bean gum
- Mixed plant cell wall fibers
- Inulin and inulin-type fructans
- High amylose starch (resistant starch 2)
- Resistant maltodextrin/dextrin
- Cross linked phosphorylated RS4
Example: Why the FDA proposes High Amylose Starch as a dietary fiber
Take a look at the FDA’s review of 26 non-digestible carbohydrates. Immediately it is evident that some dietary fibers have much more evidence backing their benefits than others. Resistant Starch 2 (RS2) from high amylose corn starch has had numerous studies demonstrating its efficacy.
In their initial 2016 review, the below benefits were reviewed:
1/6 studies demonstrated a ↓ in blood cholesterol
3/7 studies identified an improvement in laxation
2/4 studies showed a ↓ in appetite or energy intake
A second look: RS2 and blood insulin
6/40 studies showed a ↓ in post-prandial blood insulin without rises in blood glucose
In 2018, the FDA published an updated review on products meetings the dietary fiber definition. For high amylose starch, this meant a big update.
40 studies on dietary intake of RS2 and blood glucose/insulin were reviewed. After filtering out the irrelevant studies, they found that RS2 lowered the post-prandial insulin response without concurrent rises in post-prandial glucose. Such an effect is related to reduced risk of coronary heart disease, and thus a beneficial physiological effect of RS2. This led to the support of the FDA’s decision to propose RS2 as a dietary fiber.
Thus, it’s not necessary for all of the literature to align perfectly on the beneficial effects. However, there needs to be some level of scientific rigor to substantiate the benefits claimed. Here, there was enough regarding insulin, but not cholesterol, laxation, or energy intake.
If you think your product should be classified as a dietary fiber, the answers to the below questions should be a resounding yes!
- Is it a non-digestible carbohydrate or lignin?
- Does it contain 3 or more monomeric units?
- Is it intrinsic and intact in a plant?
- If isolated or synthetic…
- Does it’s consumption exert a physiological effect beneficial to human health?
Navigating regulatory environments is frequently daunting. Once you know where to look, the pieces begin to fall together. If you’re working on a dietary fiber and trying to identify it’s health benefits, drop us a note! We’d love to hear what you are working on and help bring the research to fruition.
About the author: Christine Pelkman is a lecturer at Penn State and an advisor to Traverse Science who brings decades of experience from her roles at Ingredion and Campbell Soup managing clinical research programs and navigating the regulatory environment. She brings a keen eye for leveraging the science with regulatory precedence while keeping business goals at the forefront. Follow her on LinkedIn.
About the company: Traverse Science is a nutrition consulting firm working with ingredient suppliers and consumer packaged goods companies in the human and animal nutrition space. We work with clients to get science done, whether that means organizing and conducting a study, analyzing new or long-forgotten data, or writing a manuscript for peer review or guidance document for internal use. As teams change, time runs short, or projects pivot, we provide the muscle and the know-how to finish your nutrition science and get your projects out the door – whatever that means for you. We believe that science doesn’t have to be hard, and we’re here to make it easy. Follow Traverse Science on LinkedIn, and connect with us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Share this Post